WEKO3
アイテム
再現されなかった伝説 : 構成主義的アプローチの可能性
https://geitan.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1234
https://geitan.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1234ee077022-716d-4b65-8335-19611f9d7939
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004254326 (1.2 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS)_JAIRO Cloud（WEKO3）対応_c77b0cc6(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2000-12-26 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 再現されなかった伝説 : 構成主義的アプローチの可能性 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | A Folklore That Wasn't Revived : Exploring the Potential of a Constructionist Approach | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | constructionism (constructivism) | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | invention of tradition | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | objectification of culture | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | sociology of social problem | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | folklorism | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||||||
| 値 | 論文 | |||||||||
| 著者名(日) |
原, 知章
× 原, 知章
|
|||||||||
| 著者名(英) |
Hara, Tomoaki
× Hara, Tomoaki
|
|||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | A trend in Japanese folklore studies in the last ten years has been the rise and establishment of studies which introduce "invention of tradition" and "objectification of culture" as key concepts. In spite of this trend, however, these concepts have been rarely scrutinized so far. "Invention of tradition" and "objectification of culture" have become cliches, and the studies introducing these concepts are in danger of being perceived as merely adding a new sub-discipline to folklore studies. These two concepts, however, raise a general problem that concerns the epistemology and methodology of folklore studies as a whole. And, these two concepts resonate with a trend variously called "constructionism" or "constructivism" in neighboring disciplines, especially in sociology. This essay explores the potential of a constructionist approach in folklore studies. In the first half of the essay, I reexamine the arguments of Richard Handler and Jocelyn Linnekin who have a great influence on the studies of "invention of tradition" and "objectification of culture." Then I write an overview of constructionism in sociology and show that the arguments of Handler and Linnekin resonate with constructionsim. In the latter half of the essay, I raise some important points when introducing the constructionist approach to folklore studies. Then I cite an event I encountered in Okinawa, and I examine the event from both objectivist and constructionist perspectives, and argue that the latter perspective has a clear advantage. By these arguments, I suggest that the constructionist approach will revitalize the studies of "invention of tradition" and "objectification of culture" in Japanes folklore studies. | |||||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10434445 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
大分県立芸術文化短期大学研究紀要 巻 38, p. 41-54, 発行日 2000-12-26 |
|||||||||
